When substantial intent lies about CCTV, subsequent reports, claims, applications, farming, and data theft







When substantial intent lies, one is at risk of being ignored by others. Ethical integrity that is lawful and under oath shouldn't exist as the facts of severe fraud in a deliberate plan against the reality of what is certain and irrelevant of morality to be dishonest about CCTV. A pursued agenda to lie about CCTV in insurance cheating fraud of some purposeful morals, but not when it comes to the truth of aggravated fraud and fraud of County Court in police perjury. This serious premeditated scheme of a purposeful plot does not include what is legal and what is made legal because it is not allowed within oath and law to lie about CCTV. Because lying under oath and in violation of the law is prohibited in reality, this significant design of a purposeful conspiracy to omit what is permissible and or impermissible is made legal because it is not allowed within oath and law to lie about CCTV. Because lying under oath and in violation of the law is prohibited in reality, this significant prepared design of a purposeful conspiracy to omit what is permissible and or impermissible made legal and under oath or illegal and in contempt is true because lying under oath and the legislation regarding CCTV is not permitted. The importance eliminates what is forbidden for both the significance of what is restricted and required to go against a large willfulness amounting to lies about CCTV. As guardian of the public interest in not lying about CCTV, it is my distinct responsibility to understand the distinction between civil and criminal contempt when lying about privacy and the injunctions of the distinct functions concerning contempt that arise from civil proceedings and criminal proceedings concerning the criminal law, proceedings instituted only under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 without consent, nor consent from the public sector insurer who is an issuer to my guardianships data assurance of trustworthy confidence concerning breaches of agreements like the insurance act and the GDPR, plus NDAs. I signed no NDA negotiating this public enquiry reference T682/18 to do with you lying about CCTV in Police perjury and insurance cheating of my assured tenancy agreement violated by your aggravated fraud and fraud of County Court, plus privacy breaches and injunctions. Will you stop lying about CCTV?


In the capacity of regarding the difference, it is mine. I am responsible for the difference in capability. Therefore, in the difference, I am responsible for the difference in the capability of who is to blame for the disparity in ability when lying about CCTV in police perjury and insurance cheating. Individuals and groups will be held accountable for the competence gap as a result of the incapacity of the difference that disagrees with the facts of truth in honesty for the CCTV, subsequent reports, claims, applications, farming, and data theft. Public enquiry reference T682/18 Will you stop lying about CCTV?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Root of Incapacity (Criminal Negligence)

Image
  To Whom It May Concern, The root of incapacity is unproductive because of the stupidity and frivolity of those who criticise justice over injustice. The foundation of incompetence is the stupid frivolity of people who denounce justice. Aggressors find it impossible to chuckle while one engages in successful activities against fraud. When one encounters failure-by-frivolity to evaluate activities of impossibility showing humour. Because of the foolish frivolity of individuals who denounce justice, the root of incapacity is unproductive. Humourless cannot be displayed when one engages in unsuccessful activities. Capacity stems from the competence brought on by the stupifying irreverence of people who criticise justice for injustices. It is tough to act amused when one experiences failure in their actions.  Criminal negligence is being unaware of lying and deception, which prevents one from being amused and expressing humour. The foolishness and frivolity of those who blame justice for
Read more

All out challenge

You cannot unfairly take advantage of everything having to do with less by using the comparative reverse contrast. Related is the diminished reach of a cash-strapped narcissist. What is challenging elsewhere is therefore challenging somewhere in freedom, which is less likely so freely yet ignored and can be challenging for some to believe. I cannot be purchased for less money by someone who supports my biassed interests less. I suppose a cheap moron is a worthless individual. However, the options that have been put forth as adjustments centre on sensible suggestions for a serious discussion about initiatives for fools. In addition to being readily available and affordable, they are dull and inaccessible. Are there any rites, incentives, or transformations that might be performed for less money? Educated and well-off sex addicts pay for their lies by killing themselves in committing murder fraud, okay? According to what sex offenders claimed to be in the 1990s, I might not even be a hum
Read more