Police Perjury
To Whom It May Concern,
I’m not under the carpet out the way in Article 8 Fraud of Police perjury in homicides and criminal fraud of civil liabilities that occurs when you consent to give false testimony, conceal or destroy information pertinent to an investigation, or help an arrestee escape, manipulating a Crown court investigation in order to knowingly provide false testimony.
As of January 2024, Crown Court has to deal with the first homicides of homicides that are all relevant and proportionate to my complaints whilst the crimes were in progress and I unfairly and illegally lost the warranty to my assured tenancy agreement including my belongings and work.
Expect more penalties until you are sanctioned and have to liquidate.
Your lease assets will be "wound up" for the obligations voicing passive issues with alternatives misused by not paying, complex contracts with pounds I believe not and because you didn’t pay attention nor care about your CVL, which will be in voluntary winding-up with forced liquidation as your lease expires in cancelled. You can consider your dispute resolution failed and defaulting into unreasonable defence claims ADR. You so much as attempt to fill in anything with the court to obtain offensive insurance because of this, and you will make matters even worse.
Exclusion of enactments requiring the consent of the Attorney General…
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/52/pdfs/ukpga_20060052_en.pdf #ukhomeoffice #UkNatArchives #BritishArmy #ICOnews #EASShelpline #UkSincere #UKSupremeCourt
The British Army is too honourable in defending my freedom and rights to complain without fear of reprisals corruption collusion.
I asked the British Army to help me when I was being terrorised by aggravated fraud, fraud of County Court from December 2016 - June 2017.
Do represent my complaint (Home Office, Supreme Court, ICO & EASS) by verifying this claim with the British Army. I’m sure they haven’t changed their mind about me using their contact form although other agencies were consolidated due to misinformation misrepresenting the abuse of process I have suffered.
By the way, an application from you is not allowed because you disagree too much for your own good to claim anything but your dispute you dissident dissent into a terminated asset group of liquidated liabilities.
Your contact form more than 6 years ago consolidated. Before that, consolidation and penalties to accompany consolidation lead to a sanction which will result in your asset group liquidating into terminated contracts. Contract cheating is bad and makes for extremely bad publishing of liabilities prohibited by a more responsible response limit accounting for the facts of harmful costs and loss unreasonable.
I will get back to you soon about how much trouble you are in you criminals.
Why run away in acquiring businesses and charities to live like Nazis, as the impact of COVID-19. Am I meant to miss the point of obtaining the information, vaccines, data beneficiaries rights and over that which is over the rights of 50% investments or more with trans conglomerates brand partnerships caught up with franchises, too when they were all publicly trading in a lot of private limited companies that should also be forced to consolidate their holdings, assets and profits misinformed. Do you honestly expect me to believe the effects of COVID-19 should lead some more people to question whether they should leave after business owners and charitable organisations have the right to refuse, sue and discriminate because of the risks associated with the pandemic? The political ability to litigate for requirements and the present hazards is normal and supportive of ownership rights and other legislative rights. Why should so much responsibility be up to the agencies when they have done so much wrong? The missing significance is numerous factors including elements that have been identified by indicators and consolidated multiple times within multiple cases of multiple years due to various incidents. Legal aptitude says they need to stop interfering while interacting with the influence of policy.
You didn't teach your worthless employees enough to give them the legal skills to defend fraud against fraud in the ownership and investment majority rights of service, nor did you teach them any nonexistent tactics to compromise fraud in fraud for no fraud authorised. False justifications and justifications that violate Article 8 through comprehensive legal policies in fraud are ineffective and of no assistance. Rejections and refusals to return what does not belong to fraudsters in fraud are ineffective and of no assistance. As the scenario is not relearning because the fraud doesn't care and miscommunicates not caring while directing fraud for harmful effects, several consolidations of what is not relearning can neither work nor help fraud achieve fraud.
This is an irritating situation for sex offenders, thieves, drug dealers, and racists.
Firstly I would like to say that I have a Public Enquiry Article 8 Reference you might be interested in as a Tip for your website publication and possibly a Partnership with my R&D organisation, plus an Interview with me on this escalating situation that should draw to a significant-close as of the start of next year you could do with featuring a public information guidance campaign in the public interest on the domestic policy of constructive sincerity for serious problems with a commercial policy.
Even though politicians and police officers from London have attempted to counter this by consolidating communications of media updates, the contempt is extreme in the attempt to commit three different types of insurance fraud to cheat the indemnity of how and why the local authority social housing was not covered and to obstruct the administration of justice in denial and false accusations about how and why I am crazy and wrong in complaining about aggravated fraud and fraud of County court.
The same rules apply when breaching a contract's total confidentiality without a fully private clause while trading with anyone in alternative investment, and frauds against fraud as they do when violating privacy that has limits. Trading civil while breaking a contract's entire confidentiality without a private provision, as well as committing fraud against fraud in breaches of limited privacy, is the same as breaking a contract's secrecy. The overreaching reach-around to those that don't care about circumventing surreptitious contradictions in furtive disregard for rejections refusals is denials in a publishing strategy delay whilst publishing contracts in the policy of alternative company resource protection against fraud. Workaround the damned avoiding covert one more time for sly disdainful plan unsteady and reap scorn for your God awful scheming wobbly plot receiving derision of consolidated cuts. All the privileged ridicule that can't obtain because it gets to be slashed and slapped about and slammed hard for acting tough like bullies and liars. So, the dreadfully forceful goes away and leaves the area.
Civil traders breaking agreements in denial of a publishing procedure that is blind to no underground conditions against the lies to privacy in the guideline of the alternative resources enterprise perpetrating fraud against ruse in infringements of restricted solitariness, whilst safeguarding against deception is a compromised method. Even though protecting against deceit is a compromised strategy, civil traders are violating agreements in denial of a publishing process that is blind to no underground conditions against the lies to privacy in the guidelines of the alternative resources enterprise. In violation of the rules of the alternative resources enterprise, civil traders violate contracts in denial of a publishing process that is blind to no underground conditions against the lies to privacy and commit fraud against ruse in violations of limited solitariness, while defending against deception is a compromised strategy. While protecting against deceit is a compromised strategy, civil traders are breaching agreements in denial of a publishing process that is blind to no covert circumstances against the lies to privacy in the alternative resources enterprise's guidelines. While protecting against deceit is a compromised strategy, civil traders are violating agreements in rejection of a publishing process that is blind to no underground circumstances against the lies to privacy in the guidelines of the alternative resources enterprise.
In alternative investment, dealing with anyone is subject to the same regulations as breaching a person's limited privacy. Admittedly my involvement asked for help, and signing no contract agreement to allow surreptitious corruption to violate a confidentiality clause in any other contract without a private clause whilst conducting fraud secretly against fraud for infractions of having to restrict privacy via consolidated impact, that comprised overreaching reach-arounds in individuals of a group who didn’t care about avoiding covert activities in first place for the likes of commercial policy contradictions in my domestic policy’s formal complaints. Civil traders are also breaking agreements in denial of a publishing procedure that is blind to no covert circumstances opposing the lies to privacy, committing fraud when supposedly opposed to deceit in violations of limited solitariness, while defending against deception is a compromised tactic.
The domestic policy of commercial policy like my assured tenancy agreement complained about aggravated fraud and fraud of County court without fear of reprisals corruption collusion. Consolidated Communications Default in Fraud, JCIO, NHS, Police Federation and Local Authority, as well as GSI Excel, offer managed and hosted data, internet, voice, cloud, and IT services to business clients. For residential clients, they offer internet, TV, phone, and home security. Transparency in a client's needs and pain points while discussing corporate communications consolidation to cause anything to happen. The success of their core product solidified the company's position in the market, which is a significant term that is frequently used in the communications sector to mean becoming stronger and more certain. Consolidating the marketing and public relations departments into one is a growing trend in larger organisations to save money. Transparency in a client's communication of their requirements and trouble spots for corporate communications to cause or bring about anything. The word "consolidation" is a crucial one that is frequently used in the communications sector to mean becoming stronger and more certain: The firm's success with its primary product solidified its position in the market. Consolidating the marketing and public relations departments into one is a growing trend that can save money that is being witnessed in many major organisations. The government Consolidated Communications because of Default In Fraud, JCIO, NHS, Police Federation and Local Authority, along with GSI Excel, to update media and data information sharing systems and services for money-saving offers managed and hosted data, internet, voice, cloud, and IT services to business clients, as well as internet, TV, phone, and home security services to assist residential clients. The openness with which a client communicates his or her requirements and problems for combining corporate communications in the cause and casework of Action Fraud who referenced my complaints before the public enquiry became anything it is nowadays. The success of the main services is solidified in the local authorities' position in the national interests of investors and the public, which are significant terms and conditions that are frequently used in the successful management of the communications sector. Consolidating the marketing and public relations departments of the public service into one manageable emerging cost-saving trend is increasingly important and observed in many major organisations of the multiagency public sector of people ops. The local authority social housing didn’t want to be covered by the insurer because they are not. The missing staff members that were impersonated are soon to be officially declared dead in homicides. The government began this consolidation campaign by updating JCIO and IPCC media and the rest of it followed suit. My complaints are of two other attempts at the fraud of court being falsely accused of malicious communications and two subsequent injunctions with the termination of obligations in rehousing so the local authority could deny everything and leave me in ill-treatment and insufficient conditions to claim I am mad and wrong about the CCTV and in Bath High Court, plus Avon & Somerset Police and the Royal United Hospital AWP NHS.
If the change you are going through also involves a change from harming to only doing good, then you need to redefine what change means to you in your life.
The most important details in this text are that irony can be used to help those in need of change, especially in willful neglect and its narration that overlooks the smaller borders to reputations and traditions. This neglect is driven by a desire to overlook the positive change in narrative and science, which enables narrow motivational lines between love and hates to triumph over any fear and scepticism of change. The cry of joy "are, too" is a blot on rules that do not care, a retort that would happily have crossed words with being corrected, and an ego-driven disregard without boundary separating. Neglect of a fine line between love and hate is a motivated conspiracy of carelessness within narrative and science. Retaliating against regulations is egotism in dishonesty, and ignoring positive change is a desire to overlook positive change.
#science #help #love #change
When a change in fraud of differences has an impact on you and the truth, you are also changed when the change is from irony to trust, which is when the shift is from harming only doing good you are, too.
#change
Change is ironic to believe if changing is differences you are, too, and change you are, too, is changing from doing harm to just doing good.
#change
You are to change what change is to you in your life when the change you are, too is a change from harm to doing nothing but good.
I think irony occasionally comes to lend a hand helpfully, especially in willful neglect and its narration that overlooks the smaller borders to reputations and traditions, when albeit a limitless reaction smears the motivations of care with do's and don'ts that might have been done professionally simply to be arrogant and fake. Eh, a deliberate conspiracy of negligence within narrative and science is the disregard for change and what is of the narrow boundary separating love and hate between change. Who's to say exactly, as the adage goes, when an unlimited response taints people who are supposed to care with change in dos and don'ts? What change could have been done professionally? Eh, change by change just to be the change of heart in being egotistical and fraudulent, huh? I suppose irony occasionally came in handy for those in need of change, especially in deliberate negligence and its storytelling that ignored the narrow border to all boundaries when reputations and traditions require a change in the standards of crossing boundaries.
My thoughts on the mistrust to change in essays, letters, metaphors and proverbs. A desire to overlook the positive change in narrative and science is the driving force behind carelessness, as it enables narrow motivational lines between love and hates to triumph over any fear and scepticism of change.
This hearty cry of joy “are, too” is a blot on rules that do not care, nor change in retort that would happily have a cross-word with being corrected, plus a cross-word or two with its victim of fraud. The third is ego and more fraud yet I guess it sort of helped out now and then. Neglect of a fine line between love and hate is a motivated conspiracy of carelessness within narrative and science. As the saying goes “who’s to say exactly” when albeit an unlimited response stains care with do’s and don’ts that could have been affected by the change to be done professionally. When change is egotistical and fraudulent, I suppose irony occasionally came in handy, especially in deliberate negligence and its storytelling that ignored the narrow border. An exclamation of glee is gladly an ego-driven disregard without boundary separating. Retaliating against regulations is egotism in dishonesty as the supposition by a desire to ignore and shout without care about neglecting tiny differences in details like they are opinions in others' views.
It is a desire to overlook positive change so that the thin line between love and hate within motivations can triumph over the dread and scepticism of any change that drives carelessness in narrative and science.
#storytelling #science #love #people #change
Change is ironic to believe if the change is differences you are, too, and change you are, too, is changing from harming to just doing good.
When a change in fraud of differences has an impact on you and the truth, you are also changed when the change is from irony to trust, which is when the shift is from harming only doing good you are, too.
Change from irony to trust is change you are, too, which is a change from harm to doing nothing but good as a change in a hoax of differing affects you and the truth, you are, too can also be when affected by the change.
#change
When ignoring what and who is without change you are refusing to accept the need to respect change for the want of change. Whether you acknowledge the necessity or desire for change without attention to change. The value of admitting to change is the sake of what and who requires change is a recognition of payments of change without giving it much thought to disregard regardless of change. Since change will dismiss demands. Ignorance will request a change in standard service obligations. And, attitude with everything against the patience of nothing will consequently be benefits in what can't be appreciated, nor understood.
Eh, mentality change versus persistence change, huh?
#respect #payments #change
Dissident at war in debts led to mail problems due to dissent, leading to poor returns, defaulting, and compound rolling disasters. Despite the lack of change, there is still a transition between transformation and no transformation, with people destroying and trashing discernible change that cannot be improved without change.
Mail problems owe too much to dissent in every dissident at war in debts of change like it is legally acceptable when it is not. Change modifiers re-stumble even though they fell down after dividends change in value first, second and third poor returns of multiple consolidations change defaulting. If a change must be so difficult because sly disdain didn't fully disable discussions on compound rolling disasters. Then that is the best most of terminated, plus issues collapsed in conversations majority on change whilst following permissible change so blindly in lies of change.
What appears to change despite the fact there is no change in addition to the change brought about by this change, is what looks to be changed even though there is no change other than change owing more to change.
Blithely isn't because of how and why change due to the shift on negative results can't. The transition is a blatant difference between transformations yet there is no transformation. Similarly, change is at work there ruining it with the difference between change and no transformation as people toils destroy with exception of no change to be distinctly wrecking change while trashing discernible change that shall not and cannot improve.
Eh, a change scenario that seems familiar, huh?
#work #people #transformation #change
I have informed my professors at The Open University and the British Psychological Society that your neglect cuts into my standard of living. And, although I want to use my mind and time in a healthier fate rather than how you persist in failing me in breaching and violating the rules of compensation which is causing my part-time studies to suffer against your struggle.
Malice for breaking the rules in abandoning the obligation to any requirement and standards to be wicked about them is a harmful disregard for malevolence in forsaking policy is maliciousness in intent.
Their reasons created false assumptions about my personal life and family based on a fallacy of reasoning for unreasonable convenience and confusion that is incorrigible and has no justifications being deceptive conclusions, harmful excuses, decisions made from deceit, neglect for opinions about my private life and family that are not factual and incorrect, plus this reasoning for making false and untrue statements about my private life and family led them to make explanations and decisions in deception. For opinions about my personal life and family that are untrue and inaccurate, they have made explanations and decisions out of lying to be wilfully neglectful in ignorance.
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009 states that it is illegal to violate the obligation and misrepresentation nondisclosure agreement by lying, neglecting to comply with it, or providing false information in the GDPR data sharing privacy act.
What do they presume veracity is when it is misguided, and they are mistaken in what they believe to be true? They have misinformed individuals and groups by spreading false information about what they perceive as how and truth. Their beliefs are erroneous in facts, and what they consider to be true shouldn't be assumed to be a trustworthy reality when it is misdirected of them to have given the organisation false information about what their alternative arrangements are in how and the truth as to why they are special consideration makes people and groups suffer and struggle in what they believe to be true. By practising an approach to disseminating false information about what they suppose, to be honest, they have misled individuals and groups. Their beliefs are incorrect in the facts, and what they believe to be true shouldn't be taken as fact when they have misled an organisation by providing false information about it. As a result, people and groups suffer and struggle because of what they believe to be true.
Malicious communication based on relationships that do not care would wish to escalate complaints in vengeance. Bow out of all their crafty thoughts on less than and their team's ideas about a cunning less because their regard needs to give up misbelieving cleverness as their mind needs to stop thinking craftily about less and stop having stylish ideas about less. Shrewd esteem would quit before it was ahead of itself in less-than-perfect statements and dates. Their imperfect intelligence must cease before it goes too far. Their nature is flawed, and they need to mind their manners, plus stop before their personality gets out of hand. Their assertions are aspersions that need to practice more restraint in good judgement before their vilifications become out of control in vengeful character. They have to exercise caution instead of being vindictive about claims that want to spiral into retaliation via the impact of imprudent accusations. To encourage someone to do or not do something should live to be convinced by thinking long and hard about indictment charges.
Force the Supreme Court to sign the order for aggravated fraud, fraud of County court that illegally evicted me from my assured tenancy agreement because of duties requirements in standards of obligations to commercial policy CCTV in the ICO fees and penalties, plus my Article 8 reference to my public enquiry reference T682/18 I told them. So, I can receive full reparations and be rehoused immediately by the local authority with a renewed assured tenancy agreement.
Are they genuinely of the opinion that their professional justification for interfering with my rights, in general, can continue to be ignored in the impact of criminal fraud inchoate offences pass August 1st 2023 to be seven years since assisting aggravated fraud, fraud of County court, without a reasonable doubt of the unwarranted harm they have caused?
I wanted copies of time constraints that do and do not apply to Crown Court bail applications, although I have none to see what their response limit would be with address restrictions, change of addresses, police decisions to release me without bail (also known as release under investigation/RUI) for my public enquiries references T682/18 & T9040/13 so I can add them to my social networking blogs and other blogs, plus organisation website, ResearchGate R&D DOI publishing, ORCID publishing for the British Psychological Society and my RSS Podcast publishing, as explanatory evidence within the public interest for unnecessary delays caused to my rights in a plaintiff summons and reparations.
This was a simple CCTV rewind evidence job for my formal domestic policy complaints regarding commercial policy in aggravated fraud, and fraud of court inchoate offences obstructing the administration of justice. And, I should have received a summons as a plaintiff and or expert witness with full reimbursement already and been rehoused back into an assured tenancy agreement.
Now, look at the state of it for 6 years and two months.
Without a court order, if there is a public DOI for the initiatives, I wanted to see it, and I wanted the academic association publishing such an insurance policy to do it all as soon as possible.
Their assessments of the irresponsibility of influence are too extreme, which is incorrect. There are no available differences in a disjointed system of serving the context of law and law enforcement when it comes down to obligations, interactions, and communications within reason. The intervention is dramatically defective in an idiot that can’t be trusted for seeking to misinterpret events, places and people.
I want to see the public DOI for the initiatives without a judicial order.
The actualities of actualisation are because of the policy that is an act on liability overhead and of informal interference and persuasion, plus collusion. Collision issues are generally considered the norm while the evaluation and monitoring are trying to obtain information about locations within a United Nations agreement with a platform of only nine countries.
Without a court order, if there is a public DOI for the initiatives, I want to see it right away.
The incorrigible is criminally insane and a disparate mess of contradictions in irrationality when it comes down to misusing the satellites to misunderstand the tort rules of tort acts in battery, consent, trespass, conversion, false imprisonment, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defence of person and property, private necessity, negligence, reasonable person, medical malpractice, express assumption of risk, and all of this in a burden of proof. Duties involving relationships and communication in commercial policy of any cause, in fact, to proximate cause historically and added cause to consequence to adversely affect development are defects of reason.
I want to view the initiatives' public DOI right away if there is one available without a court order.
If any of them persist in being a mad nonsensical confused jumble of senseless paradoxes, unrepentant and irrationally inconsistent in continuing to be a crazy, perplexed, and wildly contradictory person of incomprehensible tangles of meaningless stupidity that doesn’t know what is wrong is wrong and cannot admit being wrong when wrong, then they paid, but not me, they haven't paid me to be nice to them about this, no. They have no such contract. Confess, or the unfathomable idiocy of being baffled goes away. If they admit it, the absurdity of being perplexed will disappear and cease to exist as regards not admitting otherwise.
If there is a public DOI for the initiatives without a court order, I want to see it right away.
So, under no circumstances are they against the law; they may be misled.
The incorrigible is criminally insane and a disparate mess of contradictions in irrationality when it comes to misusing the satellites to misunderstand the tort rules of tort acts in battery, consent, trespass, conversion, false imprisonment, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defence of person and property, private necessity, negligence, reasonable person, medical malpractice, express assumption of risk, and all of this in a burden of proof. Confessing to the absurdity of being perplexed can disappear and cease to exist but can’t as regards not admitted otherwise if you don’t confess.
I wish to see the academic association post for such an insurance policy right away if there is a public DOI for initiatives without a court order.
So, under no circumstances that are against the law, you can be misled.
If they admit the ridiculousness of their confusion, it can vanish and cease to exist; yet, if they don't, it cannot be acknowledged in any other way.
Without a court order, if there is a public DOI for the initiatives, I want to see it right away.
In no way are they breaking the law, despite what they may have been told.
I want to see any public DOIs for initiatives without a court order right away, and I want the academic association posting any such insurance policies to do the same.
If there’s a public DOI for the initiatives without a court order, I want to see it now.
As a result, it is against the law to deceive them in any way.
If they confess to the ridiculousness of their confusion, it can vanish and cease to exist, but if they don't, it can't be as far as not being admitted differently.
If there is a public DOI for initiatives without a court order, I want to see it now, and I want to see the academic association publishing such an insurance policy, too.
So, under any banned condition, they cannot be misleading.
In terms of not being admitted differently, if they don't confess, the absurdity of being bewildered can vanish and cease to exist.
If there is a public DOI for efforts that are possible but not without a court order, I want to see it right away, and I want the academic association publishing such an insurance policy to do with it as soon as possible.
So, under no circumstances are they against the law; they may be misled.
If they recognise the absurdity of their confusion, it can vanish and cease to exist, but if they don't, it can't go so far as not being admitted differently.
If there is a public DOI for the projects that can be done but not without a court order, I want to see it right away, and I want the academic association to publish such an insurance policy right away.
They cannot be misled, therefore, under any circumstances that are prohibited.
If there is a public DOI for efforts that can be done but not without a court order, I want to see it now, and the academic association publishing for such an insurance policy, too.
Unless there is a licence granted to allow such conflict and humour, which is not permitted since it is not a required standard of duty obligations.
I want to view the initiatives' public DOI as soon as possible if there is one available without a court order.
As a result, even if they might be misled, they are never breaking the law.
They can’t be mad and wrong in any case because they are not allowed, and they are not allowed in any non-collaborative ventures of joint enterprise without legal authorisation, so they can't be, and mad and wrong scenario which is why they can’t be mistaken under any circumstances that are not permitted. Unless the situation engages in a licence to permit such conflict and humour, that is not allowed because it is not a required standard in duties and obligations. They cannot be crazy and mistaken in any situation because they are not allowed to be crazy and mistaken in any non-collaborative venture or joint enterprise without legal authorisation. As a result, they cannot be mistaken under any circumstances that are not allowed. Unless there is a licence granted to allow such conflict and humour, which is not permitted since it is not a required standard of duty obligations.
I want to see the public DOI for the initiatives without a court order as soon as possible.
So, they are never breaking the law, although they might be misled.
I want to see a public DOI for the initiatives without a judicial order as soon as possible.
Hence, even though they could be misled, they are never breaking the law.
This following can’t be considered unreasonably harmful to the state, the Royal Family, or the Church.
How can an independent office that supports the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice consider complaints about the conduct of judicial office holders personally when they cannot accept complaints about a judge who conducted the process of a decision or the way a judge was managing a case while they have a complaints process for complaints against abuse of process conducted by judges' managerial decisions that lacked consideration in the legal context? Why is it feasible or even essential for them to ask for anything and even money in exchange for their cooperation in a crime that has been drawn out unnecessarily? They can’t scam me or anyone else with such a manner of unreasonable requirements to be so conceivably harmful in a conduct offence that has dragged on for six years and may have to add probate fraud in data theft to what is already nearly a quarter of a million pounds in reparations.
Does the inconsideration want me to pay so it can think about the assistance to criminal fraud in obstructing the administration of justice without mercy, which has unreasonably continued for six years and might have to decide whether it needs to add probate fraud in strange insurance fraud of land registry purchases and sales to what is of a public enquiry ref T682/18, which is already close to a quarter of a million pounds in reparations?
All this persuasion infers is its weakness for an exhausting argument with itself over whether the contradictory fallacy of double standards and false equivalences in the doubling of double negatives is the offence of unreasonable comparatives that are harmful anti-fallacies nonsense, or whether, notwithstanding reasonable doubt, implying a debate about comparisons between conflicting contrasts of claims and dates, plus the discourse of evidence, is internally tiresome with all sides of the clue words frailty in corruption correlating into harmful insincerity of injustice. I might enjoy the irony of additional suppositions via the meekness of such foul play, which will be amusing wrongdoing that forgot to think about why they are killing and or killing themselves, in why did I kill any of them off in how they kill and or kill themselves. That is exactly what misbehaviour in conflict and humour is like, especially in murder if you don’t realise how to appreciate homicides, and likewise in fraud of any other act, too. They take too much pleasure in furtherances of the hypotheses based on negligence, deceit, and non-disclosure for the theory that is meant to be served in the context of the law that they will treat as well and good.
What a harmful protest and promotion for stylising negative impacts!
Informally as well, it is just like destructive advertising of adverse effects on what they shall not do to other parties. Who do you think is a rap artist on my wavelength or a graffiti artist on my walls' wavelengths? Are they capable of comprehending honestly by caring about the two fundamentals in general, as there may be a few of each? Trust is not two-sided, nor is it a two-way relationship in conversations, as the intelligence of common sense tells us the rhetorical question is the one-sided value and one-way principle of understanding authority that genuinely cares against two central motives that are sexual and financial before anyone feels outnumbered and unfavoured by inequalities. The filthy fraud of it and a second chance are two different things, and everyone older than me before my time was allowed to be aware of this among all other ranks for which it was written. For key reasons, we need talks, and they shall not undermine me with ignorance in more neglect, so there.
Forgetting their approaches, they are ruining everything, like both groups that want to know why they hold their hands out, wanting to join in, and again, change can’t be careless behaviour. But encroachments are rooted in mistakes no one is authorised to repeat. So now that they should stop it for change and no longer favour prior blunders for a maddening array of mail problems in discrimination that is neither less than overtly private nor less than hidden, okay? Or else their damned human strategies are causing resource chaos, like two groups that are curious about why it is such an effort to participate. Again, change cannot come from careless behaviour. Yet, encroachments stem from errors that should never be repeated. Okay, so they should stop it right now and quit favouring past mistakes for a confusing variety of mail problems and issues involving money and discriminations that are neither less than obviously private as honesty or dishonesty nor less than hidden as the truth or lies, especially when it comes down to the inequities of inequalities.
#change
Abandoning policy by deceit, neglect, and misinformation to the obligation and misrepresentation non-disclosure agreement is an unlawful violation of EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009 and an obligatory disabuse from each abuse of process served penalties by the ICO and Section 28 (3) of the Insurance Act of 1982's state contract duty fundamental to consumer rights in GDPR, plus of referenced provisions of evidence information relating to public inquiries, references T682/18 and T9040/13.
Private and Confidential POL/1162839-2016
complaint: 201601443 -- Curo Places (Bristol) Limited.
Public inquiries reference T682/18 and T9040/13.
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009, T682/18, ICO, and Section 28(3) of the Insurance Act of 1982's state contract duty are fundamental to consumer rights in the GDPR.
As I already stated, I am living in insufficient conditions due to extenuating circumstances, and I am registered to study for both diplomas part-time, not full-time.
I cannot use my blog for my student profile.
I have been in contact with the EASS because of inequalities unfairly discriminating against me due to the corrupt commercial policy of CCTV and my formal complaints about aggravated fraud, criminal and civil, in court, plus the obstructions to the administration of justice and persistent interferences.
I will be attending College in September 2023 to study a Business A level and Counselling Level 3.
Equality Advisory and Support Service, Article 8 Referenced
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009
I’ve been given an Article 8 reference by the EASS helpline (Equality Advisory and Support Service) for the case test reference from the correspondence team, Equality Human Rights, as I contacted the research team about ICO penalties, FCA, and counter-notice.
Hopefully, this finds you all safe and well, as I just gave thanks to the EASS for referencing my phone call regarding the inequalities I have been unfairly targeted by in ill-treatment as of 2015 when I used to live at 109 Monksdale Road in Bath, BA2 2JD.
I was given an Equality and Human Rights Case Test Number (Ref: 7306246) for Litigation and Enforcement Policy. I had to contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS) as I needed or wanted to seek a legal solution to do with strategic issues and trends associated with all the penalties of my public inquiries references T682/18 and T9040/13.
I just bid for a one-bedroom flat at Norfolk Crescent via the local authority social housing scheme and asked a question about my eligibility, which is as follows:
They won’t disrespect me by discriminating against my right to complain without fear of reprisals, corruption, or collusion, will you?
Disrespectful bad decisions intentionality via wilful neglect constitutes dishonesty under Article 8: respect for your private and family life; irresponsible poor choices show a lack of consideration for the privacy of life and family lives. This wilful neglect constitutes a violation in multiple breaches of the law that demonstrates carelessness in the involuntary incapacity of regard for one's own and one's family's rights to privacy, too. an inability to respect and accept the essential principles and values of human rights by giving up on the fundamental concept of democratic ideals by not upholding the legitimate sovereignty of Royal Assent and rejecting the core tenets of integrity in territorial independence. Failing to defend commercial policy for the sake of the strategy of willful ignorance is unreasonable and harmful in a seriously unsatisfactory manner. Renunciation of the impossibility is an unsupportive approach that is detrimental and illogical in its determination, offering nothing but injustice. They have revealed a personal sphere of reckless abandonment that is an irrational and dangerous tactic that poses an imminent threat via a severely compromised system of message control and manipulation of data to ensure no trust in an abuse of power against society by causing problems like this.
Public Enquiry T682/18
NCA Official ref: 1240979 (Prime Minister)
ACTION FRAUD
references 656842, 656844, 656843
My belongings at Barnabas House containing material evidence
OFFICIAL NCA Our ref: 1371717
NCA Official ref: 1240979 (Prime Minister)
Application details
-------------------
Mr Frank Kembery
Application Reference Number: 20212091723313
Driving before your new licence arrives
Case Reference: IC-103672-W6Z1, is the ICO fine for misinformation about my mental health forensic history.
Julian House, ICO fine reference: IC-64999-N1S3.
Bath and North East Somerset Council, 10 November 2021; Case Reference: IC-139464-N6K0.
Which organisation am I getting at?
Case Reference: IC-108067-T5F2 (Julian House) and Ref: IC-128365-W0P2
27 July 2021
Case Reference: IC-68008-N8N0
July 16 2021: Bath and North East Somerset Council
Case Reference: IC-116368-B3C2
10 September 2021, Ref: IC-128365-W0P2, Hacked
ICO - Case Reference IC-128365-W0P2
Public Liability of Public Enquiry Reference T9040/13 (Positive 1 as of 18 years ago with more than a decade-long gap and no LOR for any extradition rules as it was American media controlled by the FBI).
Email received on September 10, 2021, because of the email of September 8, 2021, regarding a possible data protection matter about the 16 and 23 of December 2016.
IOPC (formerly IPCC) 2015/042652
Avon and Somerset Police engaged in informal, unauthorised collaboration (without authorisation from IPT RIPA) in fraud for contract cheating.
Bath High Court and County Court pay the fee and are not exempt from CCTV.
JCIO rejected my claims three times before District Judge Goddard withdrew of his own free will instead of being replaced by Judge Collins. On the day of the repossession hearing, I refused to attend because of aggravated fraud and court fraud. I was subsequently illegally evicted for not attending.
Avon & Somerset Police have been hacking me since the GROSS MISCONDUCT in 2015.
Public enquiry reference T9040/13 is a positive one in my responsibility to transparency and level 2 recovery without secrecy.
Case Reference: IC-64999-N1S3 Julian House Misrepresentation (Eviction)
Public Enquiry Reference T682/18 Email to the ICO Case Reference IC-94009-V8G4 17 March 2021 Our reference, IC-94009-V8G4, is dissociated from requirements and standards obligations.
Public liability, public inquiry references T9040/13 (Positive 1) and T682/13
Information Commissioner's Office
Case Reference: IC-68008-N8N0
The ICO penalty has been served on corrupt police for data breach fraud related to my FOI request to HMICFRS.
Action Fraud (Acknowledgement)
Cyberterrorism Reference: 1286266
Financial Ombudsman Service and BUPA [Confidential] Your complaint (our ref: PNX-3827965-N1Y2)
Public enquiry reference T9040/13 ICO Case Reference: IC-75100-W4J7 17 February 2021 Case Reference: IC-75100-W4J7
Case Reference: IC-190746-Z1N8: Council Tax Issues with the Mental Health Act
Case Reference: IC-106980-K5X3 Data Breach Involving JCIO
Case Reference: IC-128365-W0P2 Prior complaint to IPT (public enquiry reference T9040/13)
Case Reference: IC-143742-P0R5 complaint regarding Action Fraud Publishing deadlines and deliberate programme failure.
A new ICO case reference, IC-210945-M0W3, to add to a few others that the local authority already had since illegally evicting me via aggravated fraud. This is the data breach concerning my dead mom’s probate in inheritance fraud.
At my previous address of 109 Monksdale Road, Bath, BA2 2JD, United Kingdom, I had suffered harm, including physical, mental, and emotional harm plus economic loss, which was directly caused by Avon and Somerset Constabulary's police misconduct.
999 Emergency Services Log (752), Crime Incident, January 17, 2016, 19:00. Police Misconduct Reference 2016/060568 (18–22 January 2016). Public Enquiry, Home Office Log 752, Ref: T682/18
Formerly the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission),
2018-IOPC (Independent Office Police Conduct)
Information Commissioner's Office
Case Reference: IC-68008-N8N0
The ICO penalty has been served on corrupt police for data breach fraud related to my FOI request to HMICFRS.
NSPCC Reference A-1803081
02/12/2020 at 16:27 ICO Reference Number
CQC ENQ1-9835539033
October 5, 2020)
Care Quality Commission
ENQ1-9688476216
FOI Public Enquiry Log 752 (Reference: T682/18) via HMICFRS confirmed it doesn't hold the information I requested.
DISSATISFACTORY!!!
My online offences targeting criminality have been rejected before HOME OFFICE REFERENCE: T9040/13 JULY 2013. Foolish individuals and organisations may want to make defamatory allegations to the contrary to my liberty.
NSPCC REFERENCE: A-1803081
I am trying to use the WiFi provided at a previous address, 55 Claude Avenue, Bath, BA2 1AG. Action Fraud has been keeping this reference number active since for any forwarding home address and or Internet cafe, free WiFi spot, etc.
Casework for the new ICO (received in 14 days)
House of Commons (received)
Home Office (Logged)
Suspicious Emails (Acknowledgement)
NHS:101869 Re: IMPROVEMENTS
NHSE References
[NHS:66766] Re: FW: INCIDENTS (PURGE)
[NHS:67507] Re: FW: INCIDENTS (PURGE)
NHS England Case Reference 2010-1263280NHSE:0220151
Financial Ombudsman Service and BUPA [Confidential] Your complaint (our ref: PNX-3827965-N1Y2)
NSPCC REFERENCE: A-1803081
Action Fraud (Acknowledgement)
Cyberterrorism Reference: 1286266
Information Commissioner's Office
Case Reference: IC-68008-N8N0
LGO
Your reference number is 55628. It was submitted on 03/08/2021 at 08:07:08.
Case Reference: IC-103672-W6Z1, is the ICO fine for misinformation about my mental health forensic history.
Julian House, ICO fine reference: IC-64999-N1S3.
Bath and North East Somerset Council, 10 November 2021; Case Reference: IC-139464-N6K0.
Which organisation am I getting at?
Case Reference: IC-108067-T5F2 (Julian House) and Ref: IC-128365-W0P2
27 July 2021
Case Reference: IC-68008-N8N0
July 16 2021: Bath and North East Somerset Council
Case Reference: IC-116368-B3C2
10 September 2021, Ref: IC-128365-W0P2, Hacked
They have no legal disclaimer to the right to punish or deter elements of absence without permission; no contract for such absence; and no authorised punishment for absence without the proof of medical evidence for a medical condition I don't have nor need medicating via perceptions liability.
If their working prerogative is as poor as I previously mentioned, then your work is without good cause, and I hope they are arrested and prosecuted in a public court of law.
I have written to the ICO complaining of this, and they may contact you shortly for a resolution, but be aware of the General Data Protection Regulations, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Section 77 of the FOIA states a person "is guilty of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys, or conceals any record held by the public authority to prevent the disclosure by that authority of all, or any part, of the information to which the applicant would have been entitled."
Another ICO penalty wouldn't go amiss here below, as follows:
Subject: Prosecution Notice Time Limits
Case number 522000315888
The prosecution notice served to me by Avon and Somerset Constabulary on August 26, 2020, for a hearing on March 9, 2020, was given a new date of hearing on September 9, 2020.
214 days in total (plus 13 extra days) is more than 6 months.
Even at 48 days and 5 months, it's more than 6 months too.
Prosecution Notices have a 6-month time limit in the UK.
Criminal and civil liability
At my previous address of 109 Monksdale Road, Bath, BA2 2JD, United Kingdom, I had suffered harm, including physical, mental, and emotional harm plus economic loss, which was directly caused by Avon and Somerset Constabulary's police misconduct.
Magistrates Court Ref: DX 98580 Bath 2 (Ref: CB)
Curo Logs and Crime Reference Numbers
Log 71 - 2013/015112
Log 1022 - 2013/09/20
Log 0518 - 2013/12/01
Log 509 - 07/16/2015 (12:30 PM Reference: 127178)
Log 99 - Curo ASB "Nuisance" 31/12/2015
As I mentioned previously when I made use of the website (ASB Help) yesterday, I have made over a hundred complaints of anti-social behaviour to Curo's own ASB team in the last four years since my tenancy began with Curo. The new replacement representative at Curo who deals with my housing has admittedly lost all of my Curo ASB Team email correspondences and Log Numbers for the times I phoned Curo with ASB complaints. Curo also lost my tenancy agreement twice last year in 2016 too.
CURO References and Logs
2013/015112
Log 71
20/09/2013
Log 1022
01/12/2013
23/08/2013
REF: 130823_035746
Police Officer 8717
Log 891
Log 0518
CRIME REFERENCE
10354/14
30/01/2014
CRIME REFERENCE
122533/14 (PC 3908)
24/11/2014
Log 509
31/12/2015
CURO REFERENCE
361704 (REPAIR)
16/07/2015 - 12:30 PM
REFERENCE 127178
CURO (Nuisance)
Log 99
Avon and Somerset Constabulary -- Breach Code, Pace "PSD" REF: CO/01106/15
17/01/2016 19:00 PM
999 Call Log 752
IPCC Reference Number 2016/060568 (18–22 January 2016)
26/10/2016
IPCC Reference Number 2016/075053
[07/02/2012 LOG 733: POLICE OFFICER 785: INCITEMENT/HATE CRIME: "I am the victim of inciting members of the public whilst homeless."]
23/02/2017
Log 79
999 Emergency Services Call (Police)
Log 1230
PC 2489
24/02/2017
01:30 AM
There is also the ever-relevant Police Log 733, which was created for me by PC Nigel Pinkard. Log 733 is a way for me to record incidents of incitement against me. It was established for me on 07/02/2012, whilst I was homeless at the time.
IHOS Reference 201601443 (Housing Ombudsman Service)
Crime Reference Numbers
10354/14 - 30/01/2014 (My home broken into) 122533/14 - 24/11/2014 (PC 3908) (My home broken into)
I made more than 100 complaints about anti-social behaviour throughout the four and a half years of my tenancy. I gathered material pieces of evidence too and was the victim of a couple more forced entries into my home that are not logged here. There were also several breaches of the PACE Code committed by Avon and Somerset Police, of which Gross Misconduct (2015) is one.
Social Housing Disputes Resolution (Housing Ombudsman Service) Investigating My Complaints Against Curo Places (Bristol) Limited
30 April 2016: The Housing Ombudsman Service (Awaiting Reference Number)
03/05/2016 Assign the reference number.
09/05/2016 I was being harassed by PC Mark Hodder (under the provisions of the Anti-Social and Policing Act).
An appointment was arranged between my previous housing officer (Curo) and the community nurse that treats my depression (NHS Hse-RUH).
The meeting was set for 3:30 PM at NHS HSE RUH on May 10, 2016, which I did not attend because you advised me not to sign it due to the fact the evidence against me was only hearsay evidence, and I contacted the magistrate's court to appeal the notice, which they later threw out of court as of January 2017, preventing PC Mark Hodder from trying to enforce it.
15/05/2016 I forwarded emails in connection with complaints to you, which you acknowledged receipt of.
May 16 2016: I forwarded emails in connection with complaints to you, which you acknowledged receipt of.
18/05/2016 Complaint: 201601443 -- Curo Places (Bristol) Limited You wrote to me regarding my complaint about my landlord, Curo Places.
The landlord requested that I contact them to discuss my complaint and how to put things right.
08/06/2016 I forwarded emails in connection with complaints to you, which you acknowledged receipt of.
08/06/2016 A Curo customer service representative forwarded my complaints to the tenancy compliance team.
“16/06/2016 Complaint: 201601443 - Curo Places (Bristol) Limited Thank you for your emails. I am sorry to hear that matters with your landlord have not been resolved. I have contacted your landlord about your complaint. Once it responds, I will be able to advise you further. Please be advised that the Ombudsman may not be able to assist with or investigate any matters subject to court proceedings. This is because the authority of the courts supersedes our own. I will be able to advise you further on this once I hear back from your landlord.”
12/07/2016, 19/07/2016, 30/07/2016 IHOmbudsman - Receipt Acknowledgement
14/08/2016 - 13/10/2016 IHOmbudsman - Receipt acknowledgement
13/10/2016 Curo Right to Appeal: Housing Officer on Leave until Monday, October 17, 2016
IHOmbudsman Automatic reply: ASB Curo 3 AM, November 24, 2016
23 December 2016: Curo complaint reference number 12814 (IPCC 2015/042544-2015/042652 Gross Misconduct) was passed on to the Housing Officer's Manager in the Tenancy Compliance Team.
On January 27, 2017, Curo contacted me, clarifying that the injunction had now been obtained and I would not be returning to court about this injunction.
The tenant of flat 99 was moved to another address but was issued possession proceedings as a formality.
I overslept for the hearing issuing possession of the flat. The county court then gave me 28 days to leave the property. I left on August 1, 2017.
IPCC REFERENCE 2013/004321: COMMON PURPOSE (CORRUPTION [NEGLIGENCE, CONSPIRACY, INTENT, ETC.] -- SADISM)
IPCC REFERENCE 2013/010777 (INCIVILITY)
IPCC REFERENCE 2015/042652 (GROSS MISCONDUCT)
IPCC REFERENCE 2015/053761 (HACKING)
IPCC REFERENCE 2016/060568 (LOG 752 MISCONDUCT)
999 Emergency Services Log (752), Crime Incident, January 17, 2016, 19:00. Police Misconduct Reference 2016/060568 (18–22 January 2016). Public Enquiry, Home Office Log 752, Ref: T682/18
Formerly the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission), 2018-IOPC (Independent Office Police Conduct)
I believe in my good faith that IPCC gave a reasonable opportunity to Avon and Somerset Constabulary to investigate the material evidence (Log 752; ref: T682/18) I submitted to IPCC on the very day of the forensic evidence corruption I witnessed and photographed. Scientific experts’ findings and opinions are based on examinations, tests, and measurements, and no such forensics were carried out and cannot be in any way involved in reaching those findings and opinions.
19.4. (CORRUPTED)
Where rule 19.3(3) applies, an expert’s report must:
(d) make clear which of the facts stated in the report are within the expert’s knowledge;
(k) contain the same declaration of truth as a witness statement. (CORRUPTED)
Frankly, in determining issues of admissibility by way of essential principles, I am aware that the courts are encouraged to actively inquire into such factors.
Especially of expert scientific opinion (Log 752 - Ref: T682/18) 19A.5
reviewed by others with relevant expertise (for instance, in peer-reviewed publications plus Ref: T682/18), and the views of those others on that material evidence (Log 752 + Ref: T682/18). 19A.5
(e) the extent to which the expert’s opinion is based on material falling outside the expert’s field of expertise; - photographic evidence (Log 752; ref: T682/18) No luminol test, for instance (fingerprints, etc.). 19A.5
(h) whether the expert’s methods followed established practise in the field and, if they did not, whether the reason for the divergence has been properly explained. (Log 752, ref: T682/18) 19A.5
All of this amounts to criminal and civil liability for the public service due to the fact I was a vulnerable and unfairly persistently targeted victim (the definition of a victim for the Victims' Rights Act) of a common-purpose intent for negligence and gross misconduct during my entire tenancy at the previous address. I have been mistreated and burdened by this grievance for several years now. I want a responsible party to admit as fact a summary of expert conclusions that serve this summary of complaints I have formally been allowed to make, plus I'm entitled to make a court summons of this criminal and civil liability.
The Criminal Procedure Rules: Disclosure
October 2015, as amended April 2018
EVIDENCE OF A COMPLAINANT’S PREVIOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR
At a pretrial hearing, a court may make binding rulings about the admissibility of evidence and questions of law under Sections 31 and 40 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (e) and Section 8A of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (f).
Evidence of a complainant's previous internet use (hacking and cyberterrorism)
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/rulesmenu-2015#Anchor5
Data Protection Act 1998, s. 55
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/section/55
unlawfully obtaining, etc., personal data
1(b): procure the disclosure to another person of the information contained in personal data.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person who shows—
(a) That the obtaining, disclosing, or procuring—
(i) was necessary for preventing or detecting crime,
(ii) was required or authorised by or under any enactment, by any rule of law, or by the order of a court,
(b) that he acted in the reasonable belief that he had in law the right to obtain or disclose the data or information, or, as the case may be, to procure the disclosure of the information to the other person,
(c) that he acted in the reasonable belief that he would have had the consent of the data controller if the data controller had known of the obtaining, disclosing, or procuring and the circumstances of it, or
(d) In particular circumstances, the obtaining, disclosing, or procuring was justified as being in the public interest. (Corrupting the public's decency with a conspiracy of lies; deception [false information])
contravention of that subsection
noun: contravention; plural noun: contraventions
an action which offends against a law, treaty, or another ruling.
noun: allegation; plural noun: allegations
a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.
Aspersions (slander) about me are unfair and unreasonable, unauthorised and non-policing, and in contravention of the Data Protection Act 1998, which is irrational and uncivilised unprofessionalism motivated by the intent for a common purpose conspiracy against me...
This just isn’t all of the ICO fines that have happened since I was illegally evicted via aggravated fraud and left injured by obstructionists to dwell in misguided homelessness of insufficient conditions without a resolution and reimbursement of my legal credit assurances in the AST I had, nor does this include one or two extras that may be pending for inheritance fraud, illegal destruction of data, and council tax fraud, as well as a few that Bath and North East Somerset Council already have, too, and a few that Julian House plus AWP NHS and
I now have an Article 8 reference, the EASS helpline (Equality Advisory and Support Service), due to a case test reference from the Correspondence Team Equality Human Rights, as I contacted the Research Team about ICO penalties, FCAs, and counter-notices. @ukhomeoffice @UkNatArchives @Frankly_Blam
https://twitter.com/uksincere/status/1629072276162240514?s=46&t=BYCLzWOfeQSIEyZFcffqXA
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009
Public Enquiries References T682/18 and T9040/13
I told Citizens Advice in my feedback today and the Home Office that I would like resolutions for my right to complain without fear of reprisals, corruption, or collusion dealt with promptly and with full reimbursements. It has been more than 6 years since I was illegally evicted via aggravated fraud and criminal fraud of the court in December 2016. Hopefully, now that I have the EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009 for all the penalties that have been served for corrupting the commercial policy of CCTV, everything will be okay.
What is the least they could do to support a part-time distance learning student like myself, huh? Eh, I realise I’m part-time and living in insufficient conditions due to extenuating circumstances.
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009
Public Enquiries References T682/18 and T9040/13
I would like resolutions for my right to complain without fear of reprisals, corruption, or collusion, and for full reimbursements since being illegally evicted via aggravated fraud and criminal fraud of court in December 2016. Now that I have the EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009 for all the penalties that have been served for corrupting the commercial policy of CCTV, is that okay?
In being represented by the Home Office, I have guidelines on how and why my public inquiries entitle me to Supreme Court appeals in proceedings decisions to defend me fairly in the truth against the impact of an abuse of process in civil, commercial fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and the tort of deceit, misrepresentation, and non-disclosure, plus my assurances of being misrepresented by commercial policy fraud in civil fraud cases investigating this very serious problem and serious issues with misstatements and dates, too. The Home Office and Supreme Court's stance on this topic are that misleading claims and aggressively negligent commercial practices have committed civil liabilities. I considered the risks to insurance policies without fear of reprisals, corruption, or collusion while living in the assured tenancy I was illegally evicted from unfairly in untrue circumstances because of my rejected complaints, which were obstructed by deceit’s encouragement and interferences. Underinsured assurance, or underinsurance assurance, is not meant to be an inadequate measure against commercial policy fraud. Public inquiries, references T682/18 and T9040/13 are the burden of proof in commercial and domestic policy, but without any audits of fallacy and civil liability in public liabilities, Article 8 would preferably be sufficient. Insufficient conditions of evidence and information breaching Article 8 because the burden didn’t care about what was not relevant and proportionate properly has been a waste of time and money in misinformation. Propaganda to counter disinformation has become a battlefield of lies and political incompetence, full of interference and intimidation. The contract duty basics of my consumer rights have been misrepresented, and my underinsurance-assured rights in other roles have been civil liabilities of commercial policy fraud attempts to cheat indemnity for criminal fraud. Indemnification obligation principles of 1982 in Sections 41 (1), 46 (1), 54 (1), and 22 don’t apply to me committing insurance fraud, as it is my underinsurance assured rights in other roles have been civil liabilities of commercial policy fraud trying to defraud indemnification of criminal fraud, as per Section 28 (3) of the State Contract Duty Basics to My Consumer Rights. As a result of an abuse of process and the contractual responsibilities to my underinsurance-guaranteed consumer rights that were assured in all other circumstances of my right to complain about fraud, attempts to commit commercial policy fraud and fraudulent indemnity of criminal fraud have resulted in civil liability and public liability inequalities of my human rights for over 30 penalties centred around fraudulent motives in misinformation and misrepresentation in Article 8 breaches and violations.
Would you, the ICO, like to serve the Home Office a penalty for the misinformation that misrepresented me now?
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009
If regard is at fault then regard has to change.
According to regards contractual commitments, and any underinsurance-guaranteed rights in all relevant and proportionate circumstances and others, without plagiarism of failures what would have led to civil liability from causation for commercial policy fraud against domestic policy consumer rights to complain about fraudulent attempts to defraud indemnity in criminal fraud via civil liability and hostile forfeiture of added fees for protection so regards contractual responsibilities change unfairly in what is untrue, and underinsurance-guaranteed rights in assurances circumstances is misrepresented by misinformation, regardless of whatever evidence and information would have otherwise happened during what led to civil liability for commercial policy fraud attempts to defraud indemnity of criminal fraud via the burden of proof in change to an audit of fallacy in the impact of change in the conditions of policy and political change of terms of the contractual responsibilities to sufficient change, not the change of insufficient conditions to undermine underinsurance-guaranteed consumer rights in assurance of any other circumstances, as change will have led to greater change instead of civil liability for commercial policy fraud attempts to defraud indemnity of criminal fraud via civil liability against domestic policy rights to complain about the risks of such unfair and untrue change due to regard.
Change the audit of permissions that grant profits from such fraud for civil change against the assurance of no such change in the informed judgement of change without misrepresentation or misinformation regard that doesn’t care about the motivations of regard for change.
#change #audit #civil #assurance
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009, T682/18, ICO, and Section 28(3) of the Insurance Act of 1982's state contract duty are fundamental to consumer rights in the GDPR.
An Act for consumer insurance contracts to be assured has been passed by legislation and the U.K. Law Commission. Yet, the insurance cover threshold might be withdrawn from the contract due to willful debts from willfully giving up the commercial policy to cover the domestic policy rights. If you unintentionally provide inaccurate or incomplete information to their insurer, you will be protected by the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 (CIDRA), the Consumer Insurance Act. This means that unless they misled or misrepresented their circumstances intentionally or recklessly, their insurer will not be able to deny a claim on the grounds of non-disclosure.
EASS Article 8 Reference 230224-000009, T682/18, ICO, and Section 28(3) of the Insurance Act of 1982's state contract duty are fundamental to consumer rights in the GDPR.
Is Log 752 meant to be a misadventure or even corporate manslaughter, huh?
Handover left that police constable there at the scene without backup or even paramedics, so the forensic evidence could be subject to interdicted fraud with external pressures in a remit to harm the victims of the crime scene by illegally removing and covering up the forensic evidence to replace furnishings and laminate flooring in both flat 99 and flat 117.
Log 752 is more like the murder of an on-duty police officer that no management cared about in a professional response limit and because Sargent Mark Hooder and PCSO (FIB) Paul Spreadbury miscommunicated their working relationship to colleagues.
Using language that is vague tries to conserve resources; the very language discouraged by political efforts is an ambiguous language that tries to democratise a waste of time and money, plus lawful attempts to jargon unsuccessful decisions refrain from using overly exact language to promote unjustified and immoral statements. Attempting to democratise politics unlawfully while simultaneously using language that shouldn’t be ignored or involved is an ambiguity to law enforcement and political executives of commercial correctness. Although their resourceful interests intend to democratise institutional language skills, the continuing professional development of educated diplomacy in law and politics would rightly avoid using imprecise language.
This is neither special nor a speciality.
Spying while being careless is equivalent to stabbing a child or a dog in an unprovoked attack that starkly warrants only contradictions and contempt in the context of defenceless behaviour made by human heartstrings unaware of the unsupportive daggers of unhelpful weird perils at the fearfully poor nosy uselessness of whose really good nothing less the concerns for odd and deadly shabby, as spying is like ramming a dark unwary cold jab at the blunders of attitude The resource blunders and the misunderstandings of the democratising attitude of misusing resources in blunders They tried to democratise their attitude towards a loss of resources. It is a waste of time and money to use imprecise wording for law enforcement and politics, as we are told not to say or do the wrong things. So, attempts to harm democracy via harmful politics and harmful law enforcement that should not use phrases that are too precise in an attempt by political activism will lead to democratising opponents such as oppressors of vocabulary. The vocational waste of time and resources from behind your back that’s a smiley face from the bench is the perspective that there is no right or wrong answer when they are questioned instead. Whoever is unreasonably unnecessary in an unnatural manner that nature does away with for worse realities of reasons is who?
Do they want to withdraw the references they gave my enquiries so they could represent my right to obligatory disabuse from each abuse of process?
Public enquiry reference T682/18 has been an unduly harsh and damaging cause to the humanity of our relationship.
The entire system of troubles and problems seems to suggest nothing but issues that infer weakness in folks who have poorly thought out acting unreasonably harmful for attitudes in habits of policies they don’t care about when they can but can't because of the need to address the want of can but can’t, so the entire system of issues and their resolution procedure for problems implies nothing but the same thing in the impact of an unreasonable manner again, that is harmful to those who can but can't. The entire problem-solution system of issues to the process of solving the creation of implied weakness is being unnecessarily destructive in obtaining and obstructing a response limit to the process of solving problems with can but can't in those who are ill-considered and being unreasonably harmful about when they can but can't. As a result, this is excessively detrimental to me as a human being in people who claim I have rights against this type of discrimination misbehaviour, which is and has been unnecessarily hurtful of them in making my life so hard.
#govukignoredbecause
Please let me go up to these humans about these things.
Just how void the BBC & Lockheed Martin are legally
The blame avoidance attempts to cheat the indemnity of adverse effects in the antithesis of harmful wrongdoing in the motives cause of irresponsible influence without any reasonable doubt to incite informal and formal hatred in collusion with discrimination for exclusion by vengeance. Without a shadow of a doubt, the antithesis of detrimental misbehaviour is the motivation behind not caring, which is the irresponsible influence that promotes informal and formal enmity in cooperation with discrimination for exclusion by punishment. Not a shadow in sight, the antithesis of detrimental misguidance is the motivations behind irresponsible impact to promote involvement in informal and formal animosities in teamwork with prejudice for exclusion by a counterattack. There is little question that the objectives behind irrational actions are in fear of not fostering indirect and direct hostility in collaborative discrimination for exclusion by non-offensive categories for the antithesis of harmful misbehaviour. Without a shade of distrust, the antithesis of the detrimental missive motivations behind the inconsistent effect glorifies the idealisation of indecorous acrimony in organised association with affiliated bigotry for the crimes of exclusion by the vindication of norms. There is little question that the small-minded purpose behind intent isn't irrespective of persuasion to foster vindictive hostility informally via the ceremonial practice of joint enterprises of bribes and blackmail because of discriminatory exclusion by nonacceptance of disrespect in the antithesis of such harmful misbehaviour. Unquestionably, the aspirations underlying irresponsible influence were to develop an informal and formal malevolent conspiracy, historically by con-federation half dressed down so complicit duplicity would be difficult discrimination for differing exclusions to prove on the whole of cross-referenced reprisals, as the corrupt antithesis of dangerous imminent threats became more expensive than less, plus too likely to be devoid of tolerances defying the intolerance of its bias. There is no doubt that the goals of the BBC & Lockheed Martin's irresponsible influence are to promote reckless informal and formal hostility indirectly and directly in conjunction with anti-establishment federalists' aims of establishing detestable illegitimacy that forbade proscribed rules of unlawful interferences for discrimination taunts to serve the context of exclusion by vengeance. Contract cheating first media dibs announcing the arrival of lots of flying incubi and succubi to succumb to the subdued and SATAN families and friends of victims of child sex abuse complaints, abductions and murders, plus the proliferation of forensic germs. These goals are not the exact opposite of harmful misbehaviour in fraud.
The entire world in three quarters with two different things as a problem and a solution to issues of many more similar things in two ways that are of differences centring on the two disparate parts that are aspects of groups made up of individuals that two quarters misused and abused in violating the third quarter that misunderstood and mistrusted in unawares of by one or more because of halves and half is something in how and why do they know the half to tell the difference.
An unduly harsh and damaging cause to humanity
The entire system of troubles and problems seems to suggest nothing but issues that infer weakness in folks who have poorly thought out acting unreasonably harmful attitudes in habits of policies when they can but can't because of can but can’t, so the entire system of issues and their resolution procedure for problems implies nothing but the same thing in the impact of an unreasonable manner that is harmful to those who can but can't. The entire problem-solution system of issues to the process of implied weakness being unnecessarily destructive with can but can't in those who are ill-considered and being unreasonably harmful about when they can but can't. As a result, this is excessively detrimental to people, which is unnecessarily hurtful.
If they ignore me, as if they can, then I will say how rude, which is why they won’t because they can’t, so they better not although they don’t, alright?
Regards
Frank Malcolm Kembery
Flat 10
23 Grosvenor Place
Bath
BA1 6BA
United Kingdom
Sincere Products & Services Ltd.
61 Bridge Street
Kington, Worcester
HR5 3DJ
United Kingdom
Tel +44 7710630777
https://sincerecommunity.org
Comments
Post a Comment