Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon and Somerset, Mark Shelford

 

This is evidence of correspondence to Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon and Somerset, Mark Shelford from me regarding both public enquiries references and the present state of affairs resulting from this seriously bad police report implicating the criminality of the police in police corruption via an abuse of process in aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court that illegally evicted me to claim I was mad and wrong for complaining about it while it was happening and is a contempt of court in more ways than one via multiagency assistances that were encouraged by aggravated fraud to illegally evict me and leave injured and damaged in insufficient conditions whilst harassed by the wrong. I wish to slightly revise a paragraph and highlight that revision here compared to the original email correspondence I sent to Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon and Somerset, Mark Shelford here as follows… 

““court protection order” that disagrees with my right to complain about aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court and without fear of reprisals corruptions there is the terrible Section 42 account accompanying the impact of abuse to deprive me of my liberty whilst I have not been arrested.”

Subject: Public Enquiries References, T682/18 & T9040/13

“Right, I have informed Julian House (Dr. Head) and Avon & Somerset Police of the current situation they have caused by interfering in fraud with Bath and North East Somerset Council adult social care plus Curo Places Limited to be in contempt of court in both of my public enquiry references, T682/18 & T9040/13. 

You can avoid having adult social care sanctioned and upsetting the Royal United Hospital AWP NHS plus the local social care community and independent industry of organisations and associations plus society if you stop messing around with a way to stop it.

May I suggest you don’t want to be bankrupt for additional relearning and recounting of being in contempt of court due to inchoate offences and associated joint enterprises that breached GDPR irresolutely and whilst condemned by the public sector insurer for denials disagreements invalidating the warranty of guarantee in public liabilities fraud, especially in aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court that illegally evicted me from an assured tenancy agreement without the official capacity to represent Curo Places Limited, and in cheating my victimhood as an expert witness out of the Crown court pre-sentencing report and hearing for aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court. 

There’s one year left for a few homicides whereby I won’t be pleading not guilty nor summonsed for the murder suspect of aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court. 

And, yeah they went on like that for MCA and DoLS 5 principles of Article 5 Human Rights (ECHR) states presumptions are misguided like the Home Office does in unfair homelessness as a result of illegal eviction and the intentionally homeless that suffer in the ideal of allowances and local authority priorities that have continually verged in denials dissociations for the deprivation of liberty safeguards in breaches of fraud of aggravated fraud, and in misconceptions of recovery safeguards for fraud of aggravated fraud plus there's no Bath High Court County court court protection order that disagrees with my right to complain about aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court without fear of reprisals corruptions to deprive me of my liberty plus I have not been arrested in connection with Log 752 nor aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court so therefore I will not pleading not guilty in homicides of aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court nor any other fraud relevant and proportionate to homicides a year from now, and inheritance fraud and council tax fraud. 

I am a plaintiff that doesn’t need to plead not guilty. I’m not considered to be divisible. My complaint is as indivisible as an authority's indivisible wages without breaking any rules. And, yeah they left me out of the pre-sentencing report and hearing.

6 years of insufficient conditions in how irresolute all you frauds are. 

All this so that they could contemptibly disagree in fraud and misrepresent my right to complain with what they have done wrong in fraud that is in contempt of court for provocations reprisals in vindictiveness of corruption they must not ignore. 

I would still be living in that flat if they stopped County court and Safeguarded my right to complain properly. 

Now applications to the state are even worse than ever before in contempt of court inchoate offences joint enterprises. 

Public enquiry reference T682/18

Public enquiry reference T9040/13

Multiagency staff have mentally ill motivations that are uncaring and unprofessional in the philosophy of rule of law lacking the capacity to make the right decisions especially when they are so rude, arrogant, incorrigible, complicit, confused, complacent and convenient in deceit, neglect and non-discourse that dissociates from the addiction of their ignorances needs if unmet in their obligations requirements and standards, which destandardises via dis-requirements remorselessly. 

Can they not be known for having a mental health problem in misrepresenting my plaintiff's motion in obligatory disabuse?

I’m m currently awaiting a decision from 3 Raymond Buildings clerks for PRO BRONO representation of my plaintiff motion in obligatory disabuses for a resolution settlement. 

The legislature should share reviews of evidence based practice with the rest of the teams at the National Archives for my public enquiries references T682/18 & T9040/13 especially the T682/18 in aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court that illegally evicted me to claim I was mad and wrong for complaining about aggravated fraud inchoate offences fraud of court, which is multiagency relationships and communication abuse of process in contempt of court that has dragged on for 6 years in insufficient conditions of misguidedness in my homelessness and criminal interferences in the impact fraud plus trespass to chattels and conversions so dissociative denial that’s irresolute cannot resolve in resolutions breaches of GDPR and being condemned by the insurer plus punished by HMCTS for more than the probate problems of inheritance fraud and council tax fraud by declining 4 applications for council tax reduction, but also challenging a lost ESA tribunal appeal for 3 different applications of PIP that covered non-means tested DLA and the means tested as well as the other contribution based ESA without a valid incapacity certificate in nothing but temporary accommodation and terminated obligations resulting in disapplications whilst also challenging my GP persistently, and AWP NHS of whom I am not a patient for causality of misinformation and misrepresentation as well as inequality for being Christian in how the Holy Bible has no valid connotations regarding Angels as evil cheats that don’t care about humanity and its cheats that are evil. 

Cultural rules don’t serve the law in the eyes of the public interest as a provider of safety and trust disallows contempt of court for risking the unfairness of influencing court cases to take advantage through fibbing.

Culture rules that are in contempt of court for unfairly taking advantage of primary and secondary gains of disorder that are contextual in all the factors of criminal elements don’t serve the law. 

Culture rules in contempt of court for not serving the law adopted a counter-narrative that won’t accept and admit the facts as the rule of law ruling over the state of such serious problems. 

The dynamic of the precursor's responses to the indicators warrants belief periods to cancel consuming the damages as no compensatory afforestation insufficiency alternatives in the impact of unreasonable adjustments. 

Cultural rules that don’t serve the law and law enforcement because of lacking the capacity to make the right decisions are mad deceit-addicted ignorance in their unmet needs of hopelessness and helplessness that’s a messy unintelligent offensive fallacy. 

To engage clarity in the delivery of professionalism versus the culture of Crypto criminals in the correctness of helping victims as criminals unhelpfully jeopardise themselves by misusing business registrations for spamming and phishing plus the duping in basic theft. 

The culture of insurance fraud is the same. Even complicit duplicity of roles sabotaging corporate governances as either assistances or lone and separate attacks at defrauding the state and industry as well as members of the public including the vulnerable of society that is victimised in evidence-based practice is of sameness. 

I Will just stop messing around with a way to stop it as a valid complaint is as indivisible as any authority's indivisible role and wages without breaking any rules in any ignorant fools that consider the contrary divisible. 

Stop misrepresenting the dynamic of precursors that respond by mentally ill motivations that are uncaring and unprofessional in the philosophy rule of law when they are lacking the capacity to make the right decisions without taking too long or not staying out favour with unreasonable interferences indicators to not stop consuming the damages as no compensatory afforestation of insufficient alternatives in the impact of conditions that are unreasonable adjustments. 

I do sincerely hope that shared leadership in the rule of law enforcement doesn’t override legitimate interests in adequacy versus the necessity for the insufficient purpose of causing misguided conditions considered rational anymore, even if the fraudulent causes of a massive let down in the contractual obligations of applicants in money contract fraud that has a legal duty to disclose information arising as a result of a contract between the two parties of the local authority and the Secretary of State at the Home Office. 

I am already relying on the approval of authority’s disapproval of fraud. 

Recital 47 of the GDPR states that the mind and will of fraud can’t be limited in overriding legitimate interests, which in conflict of interests results in the very contracts and agreements plus exemptions in rule of law thusly the mind and will of is unlimited assessments of processing. So, I can cross reference the compelling reasons for unreasonable fraud especially because of Level 2 Safeguards relationships and communication.

As I previously asked Rt Hon Rishi Sunak, “I hope you don’t mind me asking if being tempted into ignorance is enticing or mystifying.”

Ignorance is neither enticing nor mystifying. 

In response to confidentiality regarding the agreement and the war on terror in truth to prevent aggressors by denouncing their conspiracies and hierarchical myth-making that takes unfair advantage of thought police, Gestapo and sex offenders to be between denial and comparative trivialisation to refute addiction as habitual thinking while abusing resilience against what is wrong in more or fewer wrongdoings the discourse of trivialisation is being ignored by the alterity of control and rejection in the workplace relationships and communication due to a deterioration of skills in fraud, which is making victims in abusing individuals in the causal effects of trauma and the hunt for nothing found although recovering this state of being deconditioned in lacking the ability capacity to accomplish a daily lifestyle in the very point I am making to emphasise ignorance and ignorance of abuse in ignorantly abusing themselves and others as the descent into provocation constructs the addiction. 

I like to be forgiven for my explicit criticisms as critiquing this bore on my nature in the manner of disappointment and frustration which left me vexed. 

You are purposefully intended to demonstrate you have intellectual disabilities by obstructing justice in unnecessary obstacles for an abuse of process for motivations uncaring to make on failing in providing insufficient conditions so you invalidated warranty in the wrongdoing of compelling challengers to regulation and Legitimate interest in conflicts of interest that don’t achieve anything but discrimination against serving the law in lacking capacity to make the right decisions via scrutiny that's not fit to practice. You also do the same more or less in unsubstantial objectives that are purposefully intended to demonstrate having intellectual disabilities by obstructing justice in unnecessary obstacles for an abuse of process because your motivations are uncaring in making victims on failing in providing insufficient conditions so you have invalidated warranty all over again in the wrongdoing of unsubstantial objectives to regulation and Legitimate interest in conflicts of interest that don’t achieve anything but discrimination against serving the law in lacking capacity to make the right decisions via scrutiny that's not fit to practice. And, you are irrational, illegitimate and unreasonable discrimination against serving the law in the interests of regulation that can’t achieve challenging policy requirements and standards in obligations to people's rights but you attempt it anyway because you are purposefully intended to demonstrate you have intellectual disabilities by obstructing justice in unnecessary obstacles for an abuse of process in motivations uncaring for the making of victims in failing to provide sufficient conditions so you can be invalidating your warranty once again in the wrongdoing of no rational basis to challenge the regulation in Legitimate interest that’s of conflicts of interest and don’t achieve anything but discrimination against serving the law in lacking capacity to make the right decisions via scrutiny that's not fit to practice, and all of this goes on persisting to be problematic due to your ignorances. 

Mad deceit needs to stop being incorrigible about an abuse of process that is encouraging and assisting contempt of court in disloyalty without limitations to substantive programme failures in ignorance of the amoral ineptitude to incompetence, and indecision is not bliss in procrastination that imperils everyone with how they kill themselves in harmful fraud? I have her subjected to provocations and reprisals that are vindictive in corruption you must not ignore. And, insufferable excuses inventing victimhood through concomitant connivance of indefensible defeatist personal abuse risks influencing delays of service delivery that lacks compassion without change in the continuity of not serving the law plus in unacceptable contrasts of illegitimate comparisons, as all primary and secondary gains of the disorder are contextual in the factors of elements that are an easy hole of holes to get out of, so instead of the fault of habit that’s addicted to ignorance in dissociation from the needs remaining unmet in denial that won’t admit wrongdoing and almost impossible to deal with conceptually in that want to recover that challenged me unfairly to take advantage. Can legislators not adopt a counter-narrative that won’t accept and admit the fact rule of the state in law so these problems drag on and on messing around with a way to stop the fallacies contradictions negating the relevance of in every false equivalence the interferences caused by insufficient conditions subjecting me to insufficiency opposed to service in the law so contrastive discourse can be unreasonable to debts in debts to capital ratio going bankrupt by self-serving injustices in the conflict of interests against the philosophical contract that should have been terminated for invalidating the guarantee by continuity without change to remain such stupid challenges of frauds. 

Have you thought of arresting them for all their fines in fraud instead of wasting time and money making matters worse or even deeming them mentally ill even though they are not known to whilst they are lacking the capacity to make the right decisions?

Discretionary judgements in response to leads lacking the capacity to make the right decisions and the amends in resolve for situations issues with causalities of missive regard dissociating or forgetting about the rights of individuals in a comparative range of severity and trauma are situations issues to reduce to safeguard, investigate and protect the rights of individuals and the public to comply with safety and trust in the workplace environment, so should offenders relearn in recounting their role to serve the law by not being fit to practice formal training in indiscretions of believing liars and assisting one or more is not a right in serving the law as a rule of law to enforce the right of no right to be forgotten nor ignored and to not protect the actual rights of the individual complainants until proven invalid for the impact of abuse whilst in contempt of court to then proceed with weeks, months or even years of insufficient conditions for the deprivation of liberty in offenders offences as well as the law of the Crown whilst destruction of property injures feelings and other obstructive offences interfere to deny in ignorance the professionalism of mentally healthy conduct is not a mindful mindset in the motivations of caring and requires the early interventions of preventative treatment measures instead contributing to the programme failure to delay progress unnecessarily. 

There’s no solving no letters of appointment one can’t formally acknowledge for an impractical solution that effectively the clarity of consciousness is at a later date as in how one has no right to feel patient mishandling an uninsured dispute of no response, which is why I contest contending with misrepresentation and misinformation as it is misleading and unnecessary, and shouldn’t be commissioned in the administration of being executed, nor in prevention, estrangement and compensation, ETC. to lead are to essentially represent the preferentially required standard in obligation to serving the law and the maladaptive won’t share and will fail. 

Even though correctness and clarity engage in the delivery of communication and relationships roles to understand serving the law in motivations caring for the responsibilities to rights to ensure appropriate control of relevant and proportionate information fair and true by rejecting irrelevant and disproportionate information unfair and untrue, what is unfair and untrue because of isolated confidentiality issues insinuating presumptuous claims in breaches of wrongful information influenced by encouragement to assist an abuse of process in aggravated fraud by contempt of court and uncaring motivations neglect that ignores serving the law. 

While correctness and clarity engage in the delivery of communication and relationships roles to understand serving the law in motivations caring for the responsibilities to rights to ensure appropriate control of relevant and proportionate information fair and true to reject irrelevant and disproportionate information unfair and untrue, what is unfair and untrue by being scrutinised in legitimate complainants that are abused by the encouraged that assisted an abuse of process in aggravated fraud by contempt of court for uncaring motivations that neglect in ignorance serving the law.

Whereas correctness and clarity engage in the delivery of communication and relationships roles to understand serving the law in motivations caring for the responsibilities to rights to ensure appropriate control of relevant and proportionate information regarding the rejection of irrelevant and disproportionate information for what is fair and true, what is unfair and untrue given that being encouraged to assist an abuse of process in aggravated fraud by contempt of court and uncaring motivations to neglect in ignorance regard serving the law is lacking in whom that’s mad and wrong.”