Disclosed Will of Misrepresentation
In rescinding illegal eviction on the grounds of illegal technicalities misrepresentation of contract in inchoate offences fraud, while no court nor judicial conduct investigations office protected my rights nor enforced my rights in the summary of any section to the Eviction Act 1977, although I complained about fraud whilst the crimes were in progress without fear of reprisals corruption.
Their not withhold will as their self-importance discloses how they stop it which is fraud and as wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement, attempting to feel more important by leaving it out by disclosing the fact when they shouldn’t because they don’t care. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful.
Not withheld will is a manipulation of self-importance disclosing contract errors about how theft to stop it in fraud is wrong and destandardisation is an illegal disrequirement attempting to feel more important by the tort of deceit dishonesty that’s leaving it out for disclosing failure in the fact of abuse that doesn’t care.
Not withheld inchoate offences will manipulating the importance of disclosed actus reus and mens rea elements in illegal eviction via fraud of court and the intentional purpose of contractual error regarding the tort of deceit dishonesty in a misrepresentation of official capacity and the theft to stop it in fraud that’s wrong in negligence and non-disclosure to destandardise for illegal disrequirement attempting to conspire to feel more important than truthful and fair by leaving it out in disclosing the failure of the fact for abuse that doesn’t care.
T682/18 & T9040/13
Don’t manipulate the situation anymore and stop harassing me with that infernal contraption so you can misrepresent your contract duties and obligations within the housing law you destandardise in inchoate offences fraud of the tort deceit in dishonesty, negligence, and non-disclosure of your illegal disrequirement.
You’re not withhold will as their self-importance discloses how they stop it which is fraud and as wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement, attempting to feel more important by leaving it out by disclosing the fact when they shouldn’t because they don’t care. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful. Not withheld will as self-importance discloses how to stop it in fraud which is wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement attempts to feel more important by leaving it out for disclosing the fact when it shouldn’t because it can’t care. Not withheld will is a manipulation of self-importance disclosing contract errors about how theft to stop it in fraud is wrong and destandardisation is an illegal disrequirement attempting to feel more important by the tort of deceit dishonesty that’s leaving it out for disclosing failure in the fact of abuse that doesn’t care. Not withheld inchoate offences will manipulating the importance of disclosed actus reus and mens rea elements in illegal eviction via fraud of court and the intentional purpose of contractual error regarding the tort of deceit dishonesty in a misrepresentation of official capacity and the theft to stop it in fraud that’s wrong in negligence and non-disclosure to destandardise for illegal disrequirement attempting to conspire to feel more important than truthful and fair by leaving it out in disclosing the failure of the fact for abuse that doesn’t care. Public enquiries references T682/18 & T9040/13, stop messing around with how to stop it. Don’t manipulate the situation anymore and stop harassing me with that infernal contraption so you can misrepresent your contract duties and obligations within the housing law you destandardise in inchoate offences fraud of the tort deceit in dishonesty, negligence, and non-disclosure of your illegal disrequirement. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful.
https://www.facebook.com/110306504210151/posts/pfbid02NaBeKrXGBXBDR1NuxVyjW1BMuwujneB8oK1rRvtqhdKy25PxaFUqvGBsh9e5pwrTl/?d=n
You have a problem with me being transparent and responsible, some people say I exhibit qualities of leadership for being open and honest. But, I am dumped upon from a greater height that deems the reasoning of my truths fact in the tag and model as an untrustworthy trait of how disgusting I really am. Stumbling is understatement that will not compensate for the validity of my interest. Is it rational of you when the annual festival isn’t banned nor the butchers delicacy of lambs testicles full of the lambs sperm, how could you be such a culturally idolatrous snob about the Church and antiquated of your own museum pieces plus what’s above the door in your statues. And, your philosophical and psychological legislation concept, and medical and veterinarian educational system as well as your statistical analysis and review service in health, and work. My intellectual honesty without the discourse of ambivalent rhetorics fraud justifies the integrity of reviewing my own adult learning from the onset of my initial online experience with incentive to be vigilant and supportive in ethical authenticity of my mindful interests approach, am I a just autonomy in the principles of my mindset, no but yes. No because at first I seem to have an agenda that is questionable and may well be untrustworthy, and yes because my general internet use practices the greatest denominator of caring motivation. Is my obstinacy opinionated, I don’t believe that I am spontaneously rude, and conveniently arrogant by being incorrigible like I stubbornly narrow minded with bad behaviour to hide, nor perceptively confused by the reality of my academic interests. Remember, you are not withhold will as their self-importance discloses how they stop it which is fraud and as wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement, attempting to feel more important by leaving it out by disclosing the fact when they shouldn’t because they don’t care. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful. Not withheld will as self-importance discloses how to stop it in fraud which is wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement attempts to feel more important by leaving it out for disclosing the fact when it shouldn’t because it can’t care. Not withheld will is a manipulation of self-importance disclosing contract errors about how theft to stop it in fraud is wrong and destandardisation is an illegal disrequirement attempting to feel more important by the tort of deceit dishonesty that’s leaving it out for disclosing failure in the fact of abuse that doesn’t care. Not withheld inchoate offences will manipulating the importance of disclosed actus reus and mens rea elements in illegal eviction via fraud of court and the intentional purpose of contractual error regarding the tort of deceit dishonesty in a misrepresentation of official capacity and the theft to stop it in fraud that’s wrong in negligence and non-disclosure to destandardise for illegal disrequirement attempting to conspire to feel more important than truthful and fair by leaving it out in disclosing the failure of the fact for abuse that doesn’t care. Public enquiries references T682/18 & “T9040/13”, stop messing around with how to stop it when it comes down to your ICO fine for misinformation computer misuse in T9040/13 as your are indictable for it nowadays. Don’t manipulate the situation anymore and stop harassing me with that infernal contraption so you can misrepresent your contract duties and obligations within the housing law you destandardise in inchoate offences fraud of the tort deceit in dishonesty, negligence, and non-disclosure of your illegal disrequirement. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful. Stop inter directing fraud with external pressure to assist fraud, okay.
SIMILAR STATEMENT AS ABOVE JUST GRAMMARLY REVISED
“You have a problem with me being transparent and responsible, some people say I exhibit qualities of leadership by being open and honest. But, I am dumped upon from a greater height that deems the reasoning of my truths fact in the tag and model as an untrustworthy trait of how disgusting I am. Stumbling is an understatement that will not compensate for the validity of my interest. Is it rational of you when the annual festival isn’t banned nor the butcher's delicacy of lambs' testicles full of the lamb's sperm, how could you be such a culturally idolatrous snob about the Church and antiquated of your museum pieces plus what’s above the door in your statues? And, your philosophical and psychological legislation concept, and medical and veterinarian educational system as well as your statistical analysis and review service in health, and work. My intellectual honesty without the discourse of ambivalent rhetorics fraud justifies the integrity of reviewing my adult learning from the onset of my initial online experience with an incentive to be vigilant and supportive in the ethical authenticity of my mindful interests approach, am I a just autonomy in the principles of my mindset, no but yes. No, because at first, I seem to have an agenda that is questionable and may well be untrustworthy, and yes because my general internet use practices the greatest denominator of caring motivation. Is my obstinacy opinionated, I don’t believe that I am spontaneously rude, and conveniently arrogant by being incorrigible like I am stubbornly narrow-minded with bad behaviour to hide, nor perceptively confused by the reality of my academic interests. Remember, you are not withholding will as their self-importance discloses how they stop it which is fraud and as wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement, attempting to feel more important by leaving it out by disclosing the fact when they shouldn’t because they don’t care. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful. Not withheld will as self-importance discloses how to stop it in fraud which is wrongful as destandardisations illegal disrequirement attempts to feel more important by leaving it out for disclosing the fact when it shouldn’t because it can’t care. Not withheld will is a manipulation of self-importance disclosing contract errors about how theft to stop it in fraud is wrong and destandardisation is an illegal disrequirement attempting to feel more important by the tort of deceit dishonesty that’s leaving it out for disclosing failure in the fact of abuse that doesn’t care. Not withheld inchoate offences will manipulate the importance of disclosed actus reus and mens rea elements in illegal eviction via fraud of court and the intentional purpose of contractual error regarding the tort of deceit dishonesty in a misrepresentation of official capacity and the theft to stop it in fraud that’s wrong in negligence and non-disclosure to destandardise for illegal disrequirement attempting to conspire to feel more important than truthful and fair by leaving it out in disclosing the failure of the fact for abuse that doesn’t care. Public enquiries reference T682/18 & “T9040/13”, stop messing around with how to stop it when it comes down to AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE ICO Fine for misinformation computer misuse in T9040/13 as you are indictable for more than that misrepresentation nowadays, especially, in a MISSED OPPORTUNITY worm shelf expert AI Military Satellite that may as well be too American in the SKUNK company. So now you know not to manipulate the situation anymore and stop harassing me with that infernal contraption so you can stop misrepresenting your contract duties and obligations within the housing law you destandardised in inchoate offences fraud of the tort deceit in dishonesty, negligence, and non-disclosures illegal disrequirement. A misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations is a misrepresentation of lawful contract duties and obligations that is unlawful. Stop inter-directing all your fraud in the mind and will of staff via external pressure to assist such fraud, okay.”
Your thieves and liars along with the council. You think you get away with it. But, you don’t. Your CPS ain’t a way, and all that’s left is soldiers you can’t lie to from the East in what will be a 40% exit either in your redundancies, prison sentences, deaths or injuries and or resignations like 2008 in 2011 and like 94 in 97 plus the 80’s.
The euphemistic term to define lying and stealing is a misrepresentation of contract duties, obligations in standards and requirements. so by the time the debts are 5 billion pounds and Homicides are officially declared in all this fraud you lot do what because of a 40% exit on you all taking over what trades in more debts than ever with a new business name and even less staff plus people because of COVID-19 and HM Prisons.
Avon & Somerset Police think they can mess this all up some more?
I have told them what I think…
“Your thieves and liars along with the council. You think you get away with it. But, you don’t. Your CPS ain’t a way, and all that’s left is soldiers you can’t lie to from the East in what will be a 40% exit either in your redundancies, prison sentences, deaths or injuries and or resignations like 2008 in 2011 and like 94 in 97 plus the 80’s.”
NOTE: This is how they kill themselves in harmful fraud.
Comments
Post a Comment